PANews reported on January 8 that X platform user Kam (@KamBenbrik) published a letter to the Hyperliquid Core team, providing several points of feedback on Hyperliquid chain management. The main contents include: ① Validators face major challenges, including closed source code, lack of documentation, and reliance on centralized APIs, resulting in frequent "jail" and unstable performance. ② Testnet incentives triggered black market transactions of HYPE tokens, favoring agreements with large holders rather than fair selection of validators. ③ The mainnet validator rewards are too low to cover the high self-bonding requirements, and the degree of decentralization is limited, with 81% of the stakes controlled by the foundation nodes. ④ In order to compete with major Layer 1 blockchains, Hyperliquid must increase transparency, decentralize stakes, implement a fair validator selection process, and strengthen interaction with external validators.
A user wrote to the Hyperliquid Core team pointing out multiple issues with its management
- 2025-01-08
As the hype recedes, a technical analysis of Hyperliquid’s bridge contract, HyperEVM, and its potential problems
- 2025-01-08
A letter from a validator to the Hyperliquid team: You made a good product, but it can be better
- 2025-01-08
Hyperliquid clarified several issues raised by the community, including that it will open source the code when it is safe to do so.
- 2025-01-08
Hyperliquid integrates Router Nitro bridge to support cross-chain deposits on Ethereum, Solana and other networks
- 2025-01-08
VanEck: Hyperliquid must attract developers or risk collapse
- 2025-01-07
Hyperliquid Releases 2024 Review: TVL Increases from $56 Million to $2.1 Billion