PANews reported on January 8 that X platform user Kam (@KamBenbrik) published a letter to the Hyperliquid Core team, providing several points of feedback on Hyperliquid chain management. The main contents include: ① Validators face major challenges, including closed source code, lack of documentation, and reliance on centralized APIs, resulting in frequent "jail" and unstable performance. ② Testnet incentives triggered black market transactions of HYPE tokens, favoring agreements with large holders rather than fair selection of validators. ③ The mainnet validator rewards are too low to cover the high self-bonding requirements, and the degree of decentralization is limited, with 81% of the stakes controlled by the foundation nodes. ④ In order to compete with major Layer 1 blockchains, Hyperliquid must increase transparency, decentralize stakes, implement a fair validator selection process, and strengthen interaction with external validators.
A user wrote to the Hyperliquid Core team pointing out multiple issues with its management
- 2025-04-18
Data: Hyperliquid occupies nearly 70% of the on-chain perpetual contract market, with a trading volume of US$175 billion in March
- 2025-04-17
Migration of on-chain liquidity: After 15 months of ups and downs, who will remain standing after the hype subsides?
- 2025-04-17
A whale invested nearly $8 million in five days to buy $HYPE, and has made a profit of $266,000
- 2025-04-16
Spectral's first AI hedge fund Agent Spectra has completed recruitment and will launch HyperliquidX Vaults
- 2025-04-15
Hyperliquid launches $WCT leverage trading, up to 3 times
- 2025-04-14
The end of US dollar seigniorage, the start of a stablecoin super cycle