PANews reported on January 8 that X platform user Kam (@KamBenbrik) published a letter to the Hyperliquid Core team, providing several points of feedback on Hyperliquid chain management. The main contents include: ① Validators face major challenges, including closed source code, lack of documentation, and reliance on centralized APIs, resulting in frequent "jail" and unstable performance. ② Testnet incentives triggered black market transactions of HYPE tokens, favoring agreements with large holders rather than fair selection of validators. ③ The mainnet validator rewards are too low to cover the high self-bonding requirements, and the degree of decentralization is limited, with 81% of the stakes controlled by the foundation nodes. ④ In order to compete with major Layer 1 blockchains, Hyperliquid must increase transparency, decentralize stakes, implement a fair validator selection process, and strengthen interaction with external validators.
A user wrote to the Hyperliquid Core team pointing out multiple issues with its management
- 2025-03-06
Whale Navigation: Hyperliquid Ecosystem's Most Powerful On-Chain Monitoring Tool HypurrScan
- 2025-03-06
Hyperliquid’s revenue engine revealed: a victory for incremental decentralization
- 2025-03-06
Transactions exceed one trillion US dollars, with an average daily liquidation amount of 400 million US dollars. Hyperliquid has become a giant whale on the chain "casino"
- 2025-03-05
A whale deposited 2.6 million USDC into Hyperliquid to buy HYPE
- 2025-03-05
A whale spent 1.68 million USD yesterday to buy 99,965 HYPEs and opened a short position on HYPE with 3x leverage.
- 2025-03-05
On the brink of death, we take stock of the recent crazy gambling and gambles of crypto whales